Friday, March 6, 2009

My Reaction

They are tired of losing players. That's what I first thought when I read the USHL was changing the Futures Draft date. USA Hockey wants to make the USHL more accessible to 16 year olds who don't make the National Team Development Program.

I generally felt the USHL was a 17-20 year old league and acted as an AHL affiliate for the NCAA teams for the older players.

Last season, the USHL had eight 16 year olds in the entire league. Half of them are playing in CHL this season. Now this season there's 11 players that are 16. That's including Seth Ambroz who's 15.

I expect this number to grow with the new date for Futures Draft. Obviously, the number will grow with the Under-17 team being in the mix now. I wouldn't be all surprised if the other twelve teams to have atleast one 1993 born player on their roster next season.

If you go by that number, hypothetically all the players that will be attending the NTDP final forty tryout camp that will be held in the few weeks could be playing in the USHL next season.

You will always have players go up North to play major junior. Maybe that number will dip a little. Other players might be home sick and decide to play one more year of midgets, high school, or play for a Tier III junior A club depending on what part of the country they are from.

While on I am on the topic of the Draft. Why has the USHL been slow on releasing the 94 American list, and the two Ontario lists? I know the lists don't ean much but I use it to keep of players to watch out for in the upcoming year.

That's My Take

(Nathan also is a writer for Maineiacs Post to Post and the Maine Hockey Journal. He can be reached at fourniern@students.nescom.edu)

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The USHL doesn't care about losing players to the CHL. They only care about surviving financially. They are only making "changes" now to keep the stimulus money coming in from their take of the NHL money. If the USHL wants to attract younger players, as they should, then mandate how many of each birth year they HAVE to carry. The crap of loading rosters with 18 and 19 year olds needs to end. There is a glass ceiling on the 16 and 17 year olds. How many 91's are in the USHL this year and also how many are playing a regular shift? Not many, and not near as many as should be. Two reasons: the teams only care about winning (read - money), and the less high school aged players the easier it is to manage the team without having to run and monitor an active education program. The change of the draft process is smoke and mirrors. Each USHL team should carry a "junior" junior team (Green Bay, maybe?)that is loaded with 16 and 17 year olds to be brought along for the future. My take on the state of juniors...